Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Anything you like about motorbikes
Post Reply
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 15914
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 8048 times
Been thanked: 5698 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Count Steer »

Don't think I've really realised how clever that frame/engine arrangement is before that pic of the stripped down bike. :thumbup:
The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
User avatar
Skub
Posts: 14892
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:32 pm
Location: Norn Iron
Has thanked: 13109 times
Been thanked: 14171 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Skub »

It's very well thought out and built. I don't necessarily want to own or ride it,but I can admire it.
"Be kind to past versions of yourself that didn't know what you know now."
Walt Whitman
https://soundcloud.com/skub1955
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 8857
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2558 times
Been thanked: 4169 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by mangocrazy »

The single sided aluminium swingarm doesn't fit well stylistically with the aqua-green steel frame. I'd have stuck with a subtly beefed up double sided steel swinger, meself.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 15914
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 8048 times
Been thanked: 5698 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Count Steer »

In slightly sideways thinking, that frame/engine arrangement reminds me how different, clever even, was using the engine as a stressed frame component in my old Panther 120. 'Look ma! No downtube'. :D

+ One big (650cc...even then we were metric!) pot with 2 zorsts.

Image

(That's not mine. Mine was a '63).
The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 19356
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:48 pm
Location: Essex Riviera!
Has thanked: 20886 times
Been thanked: 13705 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Taipan »

Hideous!
NC750X mpg Image
User avatar
Yorick
Posts: 19945
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:20 pm
Location: Paradise
Has thanked: 12620 times
Been thanked: 8541 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Yorick »

All that effort and money, then give it a fairing that is useless :(
User avatar
KungFooBob
Posts: 17512
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
Has thanked: 627 times
Been thanked: 9505 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by KungFooBob »

I would flippin' love that Panther.
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 15914
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 8048 times
Been thanked: 5698 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Count Steer »

KungFooBob wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 9:23 pm I would flippin' love that Panther.
They're quite sensible prices for decent condition bikes. For some reason they never really got 'collectible'. Last time I looked, reasonably seriously, a lot of them seemed to have ended up in Oz though and shipping charges were a bit :shock: Could always buy one and ride it back. :)
The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 8857
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2558 times
Been thanked: 4169 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by mangocrazy »

Count Steer wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:23 pm In slightly sideways thinking, that frame/engine arrangement reminds me how different, clever even, was using the engine as a stressed frame component in my old Panther 120. 'Look ma! No downtube'. :D

+ One big (650cc...even then we were metric!) pot with 2 zorsts.

Image

(That's not mine. Mine was a '63).
Using the engine as a stressed frame member (and eliminating the downtube/cradle) goes back way further than that - Vincent Black Shadows used that arrangement, and also used monoshock suspension!

But running the swingarm pivot in the crankcases, as older Ducatis did, is a recipe for cracked crankcases, due to the twisting forces involved, especially with a single-sided swingarm.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
KungFooBob
Posts: 17512
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
Has thanked: 627 times
Been thanked: 9505 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by KungFooBob »

mangocrazy wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 9:53 pm
Count Steer wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:23 pm In slightly sideways thinking, that frame/engine arrangement reminds me how different, clever even, was using the engine as a stressed frame component in my old Panther 120. 'Look ma! No downtube'. :D

+ One big (650cc...even then we were metric!) pot with 2 zorsts.

Image

(That's not mine. Mine was a '63).
Using the engine as a stressed frame member (and eliminating the downtube/cradle) goes back way further than that - Vincent Black Shadows used that arrangement, and also used monoshock suspension!

But running the swingarm pivot in the crankcases, as older Ducatis did, is a recipe for cracked crankcases, due to the twisting forces involved, especially with a single-sided swingarm.
Honda did it with the Firestorm. Iirc Moriwaki made plates to weld to the frame to reinforce the motor swingarm pivot.
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 8857
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2558 times
Been thanked: 4169 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by mangocrazy »

Honda probably did it for the same reason that Ducati did - reduce the wheelbase to make the bike turn better.
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
KungFooBob
Posts: 17512
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:04 pm
Location: The content of this post is not AI generated.
Has thanked: 627 times
Been thanked: 9505 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by KungFooBob »

mangocrazy wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 9:59 pm Honda probably did it for the same reason that Ducati did - reduce the wheelbase to make the bike turn better.
But Honda then fitted budget forks and undid the wheelbase advantage!
User avatar
mangocrazy
Posts: 8857
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:58 pm
Has thanked: 2558 times
Been thanked: 4169 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by mangocrazy »

I remember being at the NEC show the year that Honda introduced the Firestorm and Suzuki debuted the TL1000S (1996?). I quite liked the look of the Honda, but my money went on the TL...
There is no cloud, just somebody else's computer.
User avatar
Count Steer
Posts: 15914
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 8048 times
Been thanked: 5698 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by Count Steer »

mangocrazy wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 9:53 pm
Count Steer wrote: Thu Nov 06, 2025 4:23 pm In slightly sideways thinking, that frame/engine arrangement reminds me how different, clever even, was using the engine as a stressed frame component in my old Panther 120. 'Look ma! No downtube'. :D

+ One big (650cc...even then we were metric!) pot with 2 zorsts.

Image

(That's not mine. Mine was a '63).
Using the engine as a stressed frame member (and eliminating the downtube/cradle) goes back way further than that - Vincent Black Shadows used that arrangement, and also used monoshock suspension!

But running the swingarm pivot in the crankcases, as older Ducatis did, is a recipe for cracked crankcases, due to the twisting forces involved, especially with a single-sided swingarm.
The Panther 100 was launched in 1932 and, iirc, the layout was unchanged up to the final 120s in 1966. The Vincent Black Shadow was launched in 1948. However, the first Panther prototype was 1900 and was then manufactured in 1901...and the mighty (1.5hp :D ) engine was a stressed frame member/downtube.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phelon_%2 ... %20Panther.
The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
.....
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2025 10:54 am
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 358 times

Re: Paul Smart Tribute: Ducati ST2 “Paolo Accorto”

Post by ..... »

The duc looks like it had an argument with the headlight
Post Reply